Washington Redskins 2006 Season Total
|
|
Redskins |
Season Totals |
|
|
Week |
Opponent |
Points |
W/L |
Offense effect |
Net effect |
Defense effect |
|
1 |
Vikings |
16 |
L |
88.18 |
-10.55 |
98.73 |
|
2 |
Cowboys |
10 |
L |
80.20 |
-27.20 |
107.40 |
|
3 |
Texans |
31 |
W |
193.07 |
156.42 |
36.65 |
|
4 |
Jaguars |
36 |
W |
158.10 |
66.57 |
91.53 |
|
5 |
Giants |
3 |
L |
13.45 |
-126.17 |
139.62 |
|
6 |
Titans |
22 |
L |
78.17 |
-51.33 |
129.50 |
|
7 |
Colts |
22 |
L |
88.08 |
-75.97 |
164.05 |
|
8 |
x |
0 |
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
9 |
Cowboys |
22 |
W |
37.50 |
-67.77 |
105.27 |
|
10 |
Eagles |
3 |
L |
13.07 |
-45.38 |
58.45 |
|
11 |
Bucs |
17 |
L |
90.35 |
-41.30 |
131.65 |
|
12 |
Panthers |
17 |
W |
68.27 |
-16.92 |
85.18 |
|
13 |
Falcons |
14 |
L |
58.92 |
-14.90 |
73.82 |
| 14 |
Eagles |
19 |
L |
136.68 |
98.03 |
38.65 |
|
15 |
Saints |
16 |
W |
80.98 |
-10.22 |
91.20 |
|
16 |
Rams |
31 |
L |
136.20 |
-22.98 |
159.18 |
|
17 |
Giants |
28 |
L |
161.40 |
42.27 |
119.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Playoff 1 |
x |
0 |
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Playoff 2 |
x |
0 |
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Playoff 3 |
x |
0 |
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Playoff 4 |
x |
0 |
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular Season Avg |
|
|
92.66 |
-9.21 |
101.88 |
|
Playoff Avg |
|
x |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Notes:
The Washington Redskins had a pretty good offensive effect from
a PossessionPoints viewpoint. While their offense was just over the
midpoint of teams with a ranking of 15 out of 32, their defensive
underperformed with a "red" rating of 101.8. Their
average "net effect" that fell in the negative is evidence of this. It is
really no surprise that the Redskins were 5-11 last year.
Looking ahead to 2007, the Redskins tried to address their defensive
needs selecting three defensive players with their first three picks
in the 2007 draft.
